Scholarly Peer-Reviewed ijalsi

Publication Ethics

The Indian Journal of AI-Driven Literary Studies and Innovation (IJADLSN) strives to maintain the highest standards of publication ethics, academic honesty, research integrity, and transparency. The journal treats all manuscripts fairly and objectively, rendering editorial decisions based strictly on scholarly quality, originality, methodological rigor, and ethical adherence.

Ethical Framework & Scope

Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to conduct themselves ethically throughout the submission, peer review, production, and post-publication stages of every manuscript.

Special AI & Digital Ethics Focus:

Specific focus is placed on the responsible and accountable use of Artificial Intelligence, truthful representation of research data, comprehensive citation of primary texts and algorithms, and absolute transparency when employing automated tools and digital technologies.

Responsibilities of Authors

Authors submitting to IJADLSN are expected to:

  • Submit original, unplagiarized, and previously unpublished research.
  • Ensure that the manuscript is not concurrently under review with any other journal or conference.
  • Accurately, objectively, and truthfully present research findings without distortion.
  • Properly acknowledge, document, and cite all referenced literature, datasets, codebases, and critical sources.
  • Avoid plagiarism, text recycling, self-plagiarism, and unauthorized reproduction of published work.
  • Secure necessary copyright permissions for quoted literary texts, images, figures, datasets, and proprietary materials.
  • Verify that all listed co-authors made substantial scholarly contributions and approved the final manuscript.
  • Disclose all real or potential financial and non-financial conflicts of interest.
  • Acknowledge all financial support, sponsor grants, institutional funding, and technical assistance.
  • Describe research methodologies, textual analyses, computational processes, and statistical outputs with complete accuracy.
  • Transparently disclose the use of AI tools, LLMs, or automated writing assistants in accordance with the journal's AI policy.
  • Review, critically verify, and take ultimate scholarly responsibility for all AI-assisted materials and outputs.
  • Guarantee the accuracy, originality, and moral integrity of the submitted work.
  • Comply with ethical protocols involving human participants, qualitative interviews, or personal data where applicable.
  • Refrain from manipulating or fabricating figures, images, corpora, textual excerpts, or analytical results.
  • Promptly notify the journal editor if significant errors or inaccuracies are discovered post-publication.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

Peer reviewers evaluating manuscripts for IJADLSN are required to:

  • Provide objective, fair, constructive, and rigorously justified academic evaluations.
  • Treat all submitted manuscripts and peer review communications as strictly confidential documents.
  • Provide constructive, clear, and actionable feedback aimed at improving scholarly quality.
  • Assess originality, literary relevance, methodological validity, and value added to the field.
  • Critically examine the credibility of interpretations, stylistic calculations, and computational claims.
  • Evaluate the responsible and ethical application of AI technologies and machine learning tools, where used.
  • Identify relevant, peer-reviewed literature or critical works that have not been cited by the authors.
  • Declare any conflict of interest (financial, institutional, or personal) immediately upon invitation to review.
  • Complete evaluations conscientiously within the agreed review timeline.
  • Promptly report suspected ethical violations, plagiarism, or research misconduct to the editor.
  • Never utilize unpublished data, arguments, or insights from manuscripts for personal or professional gain.
  • Never upload unpublished manuscript files to public generative AI tools or platforms without explicit authorization.

Responsibilities of Editors

The editorial board is committed to:

  • Rendering objective, fair, and unbiased editorial decisions based purely on academic merit.
  • Upholding strict confidentiality regarding all submitted papers and author/reviewer details.
  • Selecting qualified, independent reviewers with proven expertise in literary studies, AI, and digital humanities.
  • Ensuring that all editorial decisions and author communications are clear, courteous, and transparent.
  • Investigating all allegations of research misconduct or ethical concerns in a prompt and thorough manner.
  • Safeguarding the integrity, credibility, and high quality of the published scientific and literary record.
  • Practicing fair, transparent, and accountable editorial governance across all submission tracks.
  • Actively identifying and managing potential conflicts of interest among editors, reviewers, and authors.
  • Evaluating manuscripts solely on academic value, without regard to author nationality, gender, seniority, or affiliation.
  • Enforcing responsible AI guidelines and requiring transparent disclosure for all computational workflows.
  • Maintaining consistency, impartiality, and procedural fairness throughout the editorial lifecycle.

Academic Honesty & Unacceptable Misconduct

IJADLSN maintains zero tolerance for unethical research and publishing malpractice. The following violations are strictly prohibited:

Plagiarism & Self-Plagiarism Redundant / Dual Submissions Data Fabrication & Falsification Text & Image Manipulation Undisclosed Generative AI Usage Representing AI Hallucinations as Fact Ghost / Guest Authorship Citation Stacking & Manipulation Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest Copyright Infringement Confidentiality Breaches

Editorial Action on Misconduct:

If unethical publishing conduct is suspected, the journal reserves the right to reject submissions, initiate formal editorial inquiries, contact institutional authorities, or take corrective post-publication actions—including issuing formal Corrigenda, Expressions of Concern, or article Retractions in line with international COPE standards.

Action completed successfully!